From eed6baaea3e506a74db5ea4a1ece8fe56d72955f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Test_User <hax@andrewyu.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 14:04:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Fix a typo

---
 README.md | 2 +-

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 7211906bb73761c57b762c07189d2cfc61068e29..a8496496195a593ac81c6b929920b4adc4dba327 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -85,5 +85,5 @@ If such a case were to present itself, the compiler must make the caller fail
 instead. This is recursive, and thus you cannot create a loop of `nofail` functions.
 You may use `canfail` to be explicit about the reverse in function definitions,
 or to override a function when calling it. In the latter case, if the function
-does not define a `onfail` section, you must wrap it in a `try {...} onfail {...}`
+does not define an `onfail` section, you must wrap it in a `try {...} onfail {...}`
 block.

-- 
2.48.1